“In
the eighteenth century there were two young men in England whose names were
Lord Lyttleton and Gilbert West. They were unbelievers. In fact, they were
strong in their unbelief. They were also both lawyers, with keen minds, and
they thought they had good reasons for rejecting Christianity. One day in a conversation
one of them said, “Christianity stands upon a very unstable foundation. There
are only two things that actually support it: the alleged resurrection of Jesus
Christ and the alleged conversion of Saul of Tarsus. If we can disprove those
stories, which should be rather easy to do, Christianity will collapse like a
house of cards.”
Gilbert
West said, “All right, then. I’ll write a book on the alleged resurrection of
Jesus Christ and disprove it.”
Lord
Lyttleton said, “If you write a book on the resurrection, I’ll write on the
alleged appearance of Jesus to the apostle Paul. You show why Jesus could not
possibly have been raised from the dead, and I’ll show that the apostle Paul
could not have been converted as the Bible says he was—by a voice from heaven
on the road to Damascus.”
So they
went off to write their books. Sometime later they met again, and one of them
said to the other, “I’m afraid I have a confession to make. I have been looking
into the evidence for this story, and I have begun to think that maybe there is
something to it after all.” The other said, “The same thing has happened to me.
But let’s keep on investigating these stories and see where we come out.”
In the
end, after they had done their investigations and had written their books, each
had come out on exactly the opposite side he had been on when he began his
investigation. Gilbert West had written The
Resurrection of Jesus Christ, arguing that it is a fact of history. And
Lord Lyttleton had written The Conversion
of St. Paul.
By treating
the resurrection of Jesus Christ and the conversion of the apostle Paul as two
great pillars of Christianity, these men were saying that if the apostle Paul
was not converted as the ninth chapter of Acts says he was and as he himself
declares in his own recorded testimonies both before the Jews and the Gentiles,
then Christianity loses one of its two most important bulwarks. Moreover, it
loses its most able theologian and is considerably weakened.”
— James Montgomery Boice
— James Montgomery Boice
No comments:
Post a Comment